|
© 2001 Elias M. Gordan
All rights reserved
Law Office of
Elias M. Gordan
Post Office Box 60
Palos Park, IL 60464
Phone 708.923.9735
Email gordanlaw@att.net
Web www.gordanlaw.com
|
New DBE/WBE, Retainage Rules Proposed
(June 6, 2001)
(c) 2001 Elias M. Gordan. All rights reserved.
The USDOT published new proposed regulations for State DOTs and their programs . The regulations, published in the May 8 Federal Register (NOT May 15, as reported in ENR), are in volume 66, #89, pgs. 23208-23227. There are four major changes proposed:
- a move toward one application form, for certification by the Small Business Administration (for general Federal projects) and DOTs, abolishing the artificial distinction between the SBA's SDBs (small disadvantaged businesses) and DOTs' DBEs (disadvantaged business enterprises)
- a standard reporting form and application form to be used from state to state, across different DOTs, without the need for special supplemental State forms
- changes to DBE credentialing/proof requirements in the areas of personal net worth, size, race/ethnicity, confidentiality, retainage, economic disadvantage, and trucking credits
The retainage changes would eliminate the controversial USDOT requirement that State DOTs force prime contractors to pay subs in full upon the completion of the sub's work, even as the State DOT holds back retainage. Three alternatives would be available for State DOTs:
1) No retainage held back for prime contractors, no holdback permitted for subs work
2) No retainage held back for prime contractors, and a contractual "prompt pay provision" for subcontractor payment
3) Retainage from prime contractor permitted, plus incremental acceptances of portions of the prime contract, and a contractual "prompt pay provision" for subcontractor payment
I urge you to read the full text of the regulations for yourself. The Web page (in PDF format, requires "Adobe Reader"):
<http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2001_register&docid=01-11317-filed.pdf>
The question: will the Adarand case, now before the Supreme Court, have an effect?
708.923.9735
|