|
© 2001 Elias M. Gordan
All rights reserved
Law Office of
Elias M. Gordan
Post Office Box 60
Palos Park, IL 60464
Phone 708.923.9735
Email gordanlaw@att.net
Web www.gordanlaw.com
|
Law Office of Elias M. Gordan
ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS AND DIGITAL SIGNATURES - I
Electronic communications and the Internet are transforming the way that business is being transacted, whether across the street or across the world. Two major questions hindering the growth of electronic commerce have been
- Are electronic documents legally binding?
- How do I know an electronic document has not been forged or altered?
Recent new laws at the State and Federal levels are attempting to answer these questions.
Are electronic documents legally binding? In the past, the answer was often “No”, because many laws and agreements required a “signed writing”. Historically, a signature on a document served to record a transaction, and indicate the signer’s approval of the transaction, as well as the signer’s willingness to be legally bound by it. No physical signature, no “signed writing”, no legal effect. The Federal “E-SIGN” (Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce) Act, the Illinois Electronic Commerce Security Act (5 ILCS 175) and the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (adopted by Indiana as Indiana Code 26-2-8, also adopted by 21 other States in various forms) have changed the law, to allow many electronic documents to be legally binding. How do they work?
1) E-SIGN merely states that a signature, contract, or record may not be denied legal effect solely because it is in electronic form, or because an electronic signature or electronic record was used.
2) The Indiana Act says the same thing as E-SIGN, but only applies if the parties to the transaction agree to transact their business electronically, as determined from the circumstances surrounding the transaction. The Indiana Act also allows an electronic signature to meet the requirements for a legal “signature”, whether the electronic signature is a sound, a symbol, or a process such as a mathematical code. The legal effect of the electronic signature will depend on the circumstances.
3) The Illinois Act gives special legal status to “secure electronic records” and “secure electronic signatures”. “Secure electronic records” show that an electronic record has not been altered, while “secure electronic signatures” show that an electronic signature belongs to a specific person. (More on this later). Both are presumed to be genuine, with the burden on the party, opposing the secure electronic record or signature, to prove it false.
Both the Illinois and Indiana Acts allow the parties considerable freedom, to define how and when electronic records and electronic signatures will be accepted as genuine. Without clear contract terms regarding electronic records and electronic signatures, problems can result in contracts between parties from different States, because each State’s law may be different, and the E-SIGN Act does not specify how the differences in State laws are to be resolved. If the parties to a contract do not address these issues, a court may have to address the issues for them in the event of a dispute.
RESOURCES
3). Illinois Electronic Commerce Security Act, 5 ILCS 175, available from http://www.legis.state.il.us . Go to Illinois Compiled Statutes on the Website, then go to Chapter 5, then to 5 ILCS 175/. There is no direct link available.
4). Indiana Uniform Electronic Transactions Act,
|